SVU Episode #14-23: Brief Interlude

What’s more dangerous: cheating on your husband or giving a sandwich to a homeless guy? SVU says: the sandwich.

Recap:

A pretty blond parties at a throbbing nightclub and grinds between a man and a woman with a suspiciously large Adam’s apple. Her battered body is found by a jogger the next day; she’s lying in a rowboat bobbing on the river behind the mayor’s mansion. The victim is in a coma, and has no ID.

First interview: the too-nervous jogger, still clutching her jogging stroller. “You were far from home. Were you going to meet your lover – with your baby?” Amanda asks, in a tone conveying that this would be pretty despicable, even by SVU standards.

But it turns out the jogger was going to buy Adderall from the two teens who were rifling through the victim’s pockets. The pimply teens are considered, then quickly dismissed as the rapists, but not before they turn over a hotel key card they found in the victim’s pockets.

The Medical Examiner makes a special guest appearance to declare: (1) the victim has scars from a hernia operation done by a surgeon who wasn’t American, (2) DNA on the victim’s body is from three different men, and (3) it would be more convenient if the victim were dead, because then we could better estimate when she’d been assaulted.

(Yikes. Many ME’s have a dark perspective, but, wow, Dr. Warner, that was cold.)

[Read more...]

BREAKING BAD and the Deeper Game — By Thomas Kaufman

I’m delighted to welcome my friend, the talented writer Thomas Kaufman, to the Prime-Time Crime Review to talk about one of our favorite TV shows.  Check out Tom’s terrific new collection of short stories, ERASED.  And enjoy his guest post!  – Allison

If you watch the series BREAKING BAD, you know it’s terrific. Series creator Vince Gilligan has assembled a lot of talent, both in front of and behind the camera, to make one of the best shows on TV. If you break the series down, it’s not that different from dozens of other shows — BREAKING BAD has its share of murders, chases, gun fights, and explosions. So what makes it so good?

For starters, the show is like an extraordinary chess match, particularly the last two seasons, when the protagonist, high school chemistry teacher and meth cooker Walter White, gets involved with a drug lord named Gustavo Fring. At one point, Walter tells Fring, “I think your game goes deeper than that.” And the game they play in BREAKINGBAD is deep indeed.

Then there’s the suspense. One of the techniques Gilligan and his writers use is uncertainty – often the audience, along with Walter, is in the dark as to what dangers may be lurking. In fact, when Walter has to adopt an alias, he calls himself Heisenberg, a reference to Werner Heisenberg, a physicist whose uncertainty principal won him the Nobel Prize. This uncertainty helps make the show suspenseful. Imagine plying a chess game where you cannot see your opponent’s moves. That’s what it’s like to watch BREAKING BAD.

Another part of the joy of BREAKING BAD is the dialogue. Now, when people talk, they might mean what they say, but they also have a deeper meaning, a subtext to their words. Actors need subtext to make their work believable. And one of the best actors on the show is Anna Gunn, who plays Walter’s wife, Skyler.

Skyler knows Walter is in a battle of wits with Fring. She is of course worried, for Walter, and for their family. But she’s also worried about Walter – he is changing in ways that confuse and frighten her. Vince Gilligan said he wanted to take Mr Chips and turn him into Scarface. This transformation is clear to Skyler.

At one point during Walter’s conflict with Fring there’s an explosion and three people die. Skyler speaks with Walter on the phone and nearly whispers, “What happened?” On the first level she’s referring to the explosion, but on a deeper level she’s asking Walter, what happened to you? How did you become this way? That’s why BREAKING BAD is so damn good.

When I was growing up, crime shows were always from the point of view of the police. Shows like BREAKINGBAD or THE WIRE would’ve been unthinkable back then. Today, as we explore the dark side of a Walter White or a Stringer Bell, we see ourselves. Granted, we would not do the things they do, but through the writing, directing, acting, cinematography, editing, and sound, we identify with these “heroes.” Walter’s problems become our problems because the writers allow us to understand Walter. And because we understand him, we identify with him, even as he grows more violent and more proficient as playing the game.

Because, believe it or not, BREAKING BAD is a game and we all know the rules — there aren’t any.

Check out ERASED, A new collection of mystery and suspense from PWA/St Martin’s Press Competition winner Thomas Kaufman.

Thanks to years behind the camera, Thomas’s work as a cinematographer informs his writing of ERASED and Other Stories. Filming interviews with Holocaust survivors, cops, PI’s, con men, and killers, Thomas has kept his eyes — and his ears — open.  He has shot multiple projects with Academy award winners Charles Guggenheim, Barbara Kopple, and Mark Harris.  Plus, his time directing and shooting TV crime shows gives his work the feel of what’s real.

‘Kaufman is a welcome new voice in DC crime fiction.” – George Pelecanos, author of WHAT IT WAS
‘Fast and funny, with a huge heart. Kaufman is clearly a writer worth keeping an eye on.’ ­ Steve Hamilton, author of THE LOCK ARTIST

SVU Episode #14-22: Poisoned Motive

Prisoners fathering children with prison workers; rogue cops going on killing sprees targeting other cops: Tonight’s episode took several real cases of official misconduct and turned them into a fairly unrealistic but fast-moving story about mental illness, rage, and revenge.

Recap:

As Amanda leads a human trafficker on a perp-walk from police headquarters, she’s shot in the shoulder by a sniper hiding on a nearby rooftop! Finn rushes her to the hospital, where she recovers in a slurry morphine stupor. Finn promises to find the bad guy who hurt his partner.

Our detectives cycle through the requisite colorful suspects, including: (1) the “dragon lady” trafficker who was being perp-walked, (2) a hippie druggie friend of Amanda’s no-good sister who had a beef with Amanda for shooting the sister’s no-good boyfriend, and (3) “Escobar,” a notorious drug dealer who tried to kill Finn fifteen years earlier, but failed when Finn’s beloved partner, Luis (who we’ve never heard of before tonight), took the bullet.

Escobar fathered a child with a foxy prison nurse named Anna, who subsequently became an ex-prison-nurse. For a minute, we suspect that she’s helping Escobar plan the attacks. [Read more...]

SVU Episode #14-21: Traumatic Wound

It is an immutable law of SVU that if a wealthy young woman has a significant role before the second commercial break, she will either turn out to be a rape victim or a mastermind behind the assault – even if it was gang rape by a bunch of crazed strangers in a crowded nightclub. Tonight’s episode stayed true to this silly form.

Recap:

Two pretty young women get ready for a night on the town. Bubbly Brit persuades shy Gabby to wear a strapless yellow top. “Jake will love it!” Brit gushes. Gabby, Brit and preppy Jake go to a nightclub and have fun watching the band, until fireworks go off behind the stage. (Um, didn’t we learn that was a bad idea after the Great White tragedy? Are fireworks even allowed at indoor concerts any more? The lawyer in me starting calculating the nightclub’s tort liability, and there were a lot of zeros.)

Anyway, in the midst of the fireworks, someone pulls down Gabby’s top, exposing her breasts. Seeing this, a bunch of scraggly male clubgoers descend on Gabby, push her to the ground, and violently gang rape her.

At first, our detectives think the head of club security, Frank, was the ringleader. But Frank served a couple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is suffering from PTSD. Confused, he admits to the rape, then realizes he didn’t do it, and eventually helps ID the real bad guys.

Turns out, there are two sets of bad guys. First set: the scraggly clubbers who actually raped Gabby. Second set: three of Gabby’s rich prep-school friends, who pulled off her top in the first place. See, Gabby’s ex-boyfriend, Alec, wanted to get back at her for dumping him. So his BFF Brit befriended Gabby, got her to wear the flimsy top, brought her to the club, and signaled for the de-shirting to begin. Jake was in on it too. The trio paid a blue-collar kid to “top-shark” Gabby, that is, pull her top off in order to take a topless photo of her.

Who should the detectives focus on: the shirt-snatchers or the gang rapists? The shirt-snatchers, of course! Another immutable law of SVU requires immediate prosecution of any character who is questioned while: (a) carrying oars at his rowing club, (b) wearing tennis whites, or (c) shopping at pricey boutiques. Since our preppy trio did all three, they are immediately indicted. [Read more...]

SVU Episode #14-20: Girl Dishonored

Tonight’s harrowing SVU about a college systematically mistreating its student/rape victims featured plot twists so shocking they hardly seemed plausible – except that they were drawn directly from allegations made in real-life cases.

Recap: A pretty young college freshman named Lindsey goes to a frat party, where a cocky blueblood named Travis and two of Travis’s frat brothers brutally gang rape her.

Lindsey goes to a hospital, but before a sex kit is done, the head of the college’s Campus Security advises her to take a shower. She washes away much of the evidence. And although she reports the rape to Olivia and Amanda, she also sends a topless Snapchat photo of herself to Travis the next day. (He asked for it, and she thought he might date her if she sent it.) After that photo ends up on the “Slut of the Week” website, Lindsey backs down and drops the charges. She doesn’t want to end up like Renee, another college girl who Travis raped, and who ended up in a psych ward.

Olivia visits Renee in the mental hospital. The girl is undergoing electric-shock treatments [Read more...]

Jodi Arias and the Dilemma of Beautiful Killers: What’s the optimal amount of lipgloss to avoid the electric chair?

One of the more interesting visuals in any criminal trial is how the defendant presents himself.  As a prosecutor, I saw countless defense makeovers: brutish thugs who walked into the courtroom almost unrecognizable in pressed khakis, a neat haircut, and fake glasses plucked from a bin in their lawyer’s office.  But the most striking makeovers often occur when a beautiful young woman is on trial.  Then, the switcheroo is usually a makeunder.  Jodi Arias is the most recent case in point, going from hottie to ho-hum faster than you can say, “Arizona has the death penalty.”  But I think her deliberate frump is a bad strategy.

Now in her 39th day of trial, Arias is charged with brutally killing her ex-boyfriend, Travis Alexander, on June 4, 2008.   According to the prosecution, Arias went to Alexander’s house, had sex with him, took naked photos of them together, then shot him in the face, slit his throat, and stabbed him 27 times.  Arias has offered many stories  – first, she wasn’t there; second, she was there but masked intruders murdered him – and now admits she killed Alexander, but claims it was self-defense.

Arias currently appears to be a different woman than the who walked out of Alexander’s home that June day.  Back then, she was a buxom blonde with long platinum hair, kohl-lined eyes, and lips glossed to the outer limits of poutiness.  She wore t-shirts a few sizes too small, emphasizing her Barbie-like figure.  She easily could have played the femme fatale in any noir novel.

Today, Arias’s hair is dull brown, with wispy bangs covering her forehead.  A little-girl side ponytail occasionally clamps a section back.  Sitting at the defense table, she wears modest button-up blouses in sweet blues and innocent whites.  Brown plastic glasses dominate her makeupless face.  She looks like a shy, frumpy librarian.

Arias and her defense team clearly think the church-mouse look will help her chances with the jury.  Are they right?  Depends which statistics you read.

A Cornell study found that “unattractive” defendants were 22% more likely to be convicted at trial than those deemed “attractive.”  Moreover, unattractive criminals served harsher sentences – roughly 20 months longer than their cute counterparts.  Bring out the lipgloss, ladies.

On the other hand, a University of Granada study found that beautiful women were more likely to be found guilty of murdering their husbands than plainer ones.  According to the Daily Mail, “in the case of a woman claiming self-defense in the killing of an abusive husband, police officers were more likely to regard as innocent defendants who were described as unattractive.

The findings also showed that women perceived as more independent and in charge of their lives were also more likely to be seen as guilty of murder.”  Hm, ladies, maybe you should put away that compact and meekly gaze at your hands.

So what’s a pretty defendant to do?

I think it depends on how strong the case is. If the prosecution is weak, a bombshell might benefit from playing down her looks and reducing the risk of resentment from female jurors.  In Jodi Arias’s case, however, the government’s evidence is strong.  She’s lied so many times, people are highly skeptical of her story now.  In my opinion, she simply cannot be acquitted at trial.  However, she could avoid the electric chair if she got just one juror to take her side.  Since verdicts need to be unanimous, a single holdout could hang the whole case – and save her from hanging.  For that reason, Arias’s better strategy might have been to come to court in full vixen mode, and hope to make one of the jurors fall in love with her.

Of course, we all wish Justice was blind.  But since jurors don’t wear blindfolds, female defendants are wise to consider not only the best lawyer, but just the right shade of lipgloss.

SVU Episode #14-19: Born Psychopath

Most nights, SVU explores the nightmare of someone terrible hurting your family. But what if the terrible someone was part of your family? What if he was your son?

Recap: A rich, beautiful Upper West Side couple is living the perfect Manhattan life, until their adorable four-year-old daughter, Ruby, goes to the school nurse with bruises on her abdomen. At first, the buxom blond nanny is suspected.

But the detectives soon learn that the real culprit is Ruby’s ten-year-old brother, Henry, who pushed his sister down the stairs because he was curious about how she would fall. Henry’s mental issues are bad enough that B.D. Wong flies in for special guest appearance and determines that, although Henry is smart, he feels and understands no emotions. Wong ruminates, “I hate to label a ten-year-old a psychopath. But…”

Henry’s parents resist the horrifying diagnosis. Their son won’t be able to get into a good middle school with that label. But Henry gets worse. He pulls a knife on his mom and slices her hand. He asks to hold Amanda’s gun while nibbling strawberries in what was possibly the most menacing organic-fruit scene in TV history. And when his parents tell him they’re sending him to a treatment facility, he locks mom in the laundry room, ties Ruby to a bed, and sets the apartment on fire.

[Read more...]

Jodi Arias’s Makeunder

I was thrilled to be invited to MSNBC’s “The Cycle” today, to talk about Jodi Arias: her chances at trial, and the reasons behind her stunning makeunder.  You can check out the footage here:

 

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy