It’s possible that I became a prosecutor because I love crime dramas. Or maybe I just love crime dramas because I was a prosecutor. One thing is clear: lawyers can’t stop talking about their work. We tell war stories at the drop of a hat. And prosecutors have some of the best material, because crime naturally has the elements that make a compelling narrative. The stakes are the highest imaginable: life, death, freedom, and justice.
Now that I write about crimes instead of prosecuting them, I’ve been wondering: why are TV crime dramas so addictive? Why are we fascinated with them? And why is it that, despite my compulsion, some of these shows drive me crazy?
Here’s what I concluded…
WHY WE LOVE TV CRIME DRAMA
We love TV crime dramas because they play on (and relieve) our FEAR.
I’ve heard a theory that the horror of 9/11 created a sense of vulnerability in our national consciousness, and that watching the good guys win makes us feel better. But I’m not sure about that. Shows like Law & Order, Perry Mason, Dragnet, and LA Law far preceded 9/11. So it’s something deeper than 9/11. I think there’s a primal fear we all have, rooted deep in our lizard brains.
We’ve all have had moments of feeling vulnerable, or looking over our shoulder while walking down the street. We hear about crimes happening every day (and the news only reports the most vicious attacks). We wonder: could that happen to me. How can I prevent it?
We need to see good triumph over the bad in the world. We want to know society will stop those darker impulses. The murderer will be caught, the criminals will be held responsible. We want to see justice.
People ask me where I get the stories for my books. I get them from 12 years of prosecuting crimes in our nation’s capital. I’ve seen some scary stuff. And I put it in my fiction.
On the other side of the coin,
Crime dramas channel our ANGER.
There’s a famous saying: Bad men do what good men dream.
Who hasn’t wanted to kill someone? Heck, I often want to hit my husband over the head with a frying pan just for the comments he makes when I’m blogging.
Just as we’ve all heard stories of violence and wondered, What if I was the victim? – we’ve all have had moments of thinking, What if I was the perpetrator? What if I let loose with that frying pan? How would that play out?
There’s a need to explore the dark side of our nature, to figure out what could make us so angry that we’d break from the restraints of civilized society, years of our mothers telling us to treat others the way we want to be treated. We wonder what the consequences would be. We both fantasize about this and fear this.
They express our LOVE.
Many of the best crime stories are also love stories. At the heart of many murder mysteries is the intersection of love and hate.
Murder is often about intense emotions, and nothing makes emotions more intense than interacting with the people closest to you. The first story in the Bible is about Adam and Eve, and in many ways it’s a love story. And yet it wasn’t long before we heard about the first murder: brothers Cain and Abel.
Often, the killer is someone very close to the victim: a spouse, lover, sibling, relative, or friend.
As a prosecutor of sex crimes and domestic violence in D.C. I saw this all the time. It inspired my first book, Law of Attraction.
There’s a point in most Law & Order episodes where a suspect says “I didn’t kill her! I loved her!” And although this is a well-trod path, crime dramas keep taking it. Because we’ve all felt that way. We would do anything to protect the ones we love. Or we want to kill them.
Here’s a great compilation of that “I loved her” moment:
About half the time, the person declaring their love for the victim ends up being the killer.
The best crime dramas have great CHARACTERS.
Of course, at the heart of any great detective story are wonderful characters. Heroes: someone who will right the wrongs, who won’t let us down. Men and women with a deep commitment to justice, to finding the truth. Villains: someone worthy of our hero’s attention, who could really screw up the world if he gets away with his evil plan. But these heroes and villains can’t be one-dimensional. What we really love are complicated characters. Flawed heroes. Appealing villains. Here are a few of my favorite.
We all love his amazing powers of deduction, his dedication, his intelligence. But he’s prone to extreme isolation and intense distrust of women, and he habitually uses cocaine and morphine.
from the original Law & Order
He has a brilliant legal mind, but is an unconventional, ruthless litigator, willing to bend and sometimes break the rules. But we understand at all points that his underlying motivation is a sincere desire to see justice done.
In recent years, we’ve seen the development of the Antihero at the center of a crime drama:
He’s our golden-haired serial killer. Dexter is a blood spatter pattern analyst for the Miami Police Department. On the side, he kills serial killers, but first goes to great lengths to be sure they’re guilty. This is dark vigilante justice.
After learning he has cancer, a high school chemistry teacher turns to using his expertise in chemistry to provide a legacy for his family – by producing the world’s highest quality crystal meth. As the seasons have gone on, Walter has gotten gotten much more “anti” and much less “hero.”
Stringer is the second-in-command to a drug kingpin, and responsible for the daily operations. He orders incredibly violent, brutal acts – but attends college economics classes, has a copy of Adam Smith’s the Wealth of Nations, and in many ways runs the drug operation like a very professional business. Even as he orders crimes, you like him. Doesn’t hurt that he’s played by dreamy dreamy Idris Elba.
Omar is an exceptionally ruthless and feared stick-up man, known for his facial scar and the shotgun he carries under his trenchcoat. But he lives by a strict moral code, and only robs drug dealers. He’s gay, disapproves of profanity, and accompanies his elderly grandmother to church once a month. In many ways, Omar is more honorable than the police characters who are trying to catch him.
So these are some great, multi-layered characters. But modern TV dramas need to provide even more than that.
Crime dramas need to TEACH us.
The best crime dramas teach us about how our criminal justice system works — and how it doesn’t. They show us what the legal process is really like, the rules we’re all operating under. And they give us a glimpse of modern technology and know-how.
This is the most realistic TV crime drama. It covered crime in Baltimore, especially the drug trade, and the techniques the police used to fight it. The show was so realistic, it was reported that criminals watched it to get tips on avoiding police detection.
An elite group of psychological profilers analyze the nation’s most dangerous criminal minds in an effort to anticipate their next moves before they strike again.
Solving crimes using forensic science, especially cold cases, where the main evidence is the bones of the victim.
Law & Order: SVU
You know this is one of my favorites to both love and hate. I’ve spent the last two seasons nitpicking their episodes. SVU is great at doing ripped-from-the-headlines cases, and often shines a light on dark subjects. This season, SVU did a remarkable episode about male victims of sex crimes, paralleling the Jerry Sandusky/Joe Paterno case. The episode got people talking about this taboo subject, and may encourage other victims of similar crimes to come forward.
An elite team of police forensic evidence experts work their cases in Las Vegas, employing unbelievable science. I say unbelievable in the most literal sense. This is one of the most problematic shows, from my perspective as a prosecutor. More on that later.
TV crime dramas are FUN.
SVU had episodes last season featuring gypsy encampments, body modification, and vigilante justice doled out by regular Joes wearing superhero costumes. While these cases don’t show the real day-to-day work of a sex-crimes prosecutor, they’re a lot of fun to watch, and a lot more interesting than some of the real day-to-day work of prosecutors, like shepherdizing briefs and redacting Grand Jury transcripts.
So – I’m a big fan of TV crime dramas. At the same time…
I HATE THEM.
When they’re fake.
This is when I personally throw a slipper at the TV. When the hero can’t solve the crime without resorting to some magical crime-solving device no police officer has ever seen. If I want to see magic, I’ll watch Harry Potter.
There’s actually a phenomenon created by these shows called the CSI Effect. Jurors today want to see some kind of high-tech crime-fighting science, because they’ve seen it on TV: DNA off an eyelash left at the scene, or a magical fingerprint detecting camera. As a prosecutor, a large part of my job was bringing the jury’s expectations into line with reality, despite these TV shows.
The Worst Offenders:
1. You won’t get fingerprints off that gun.
Sorry, not gonna catch the killer that way. Usable prints are notoriously tough to get, and guns are the worst surface to get them from. A combination of conditions – dry skin, too much humidity, textured rubber or metal – conspire to wipe the gun clean, even if the shooter didn’t do it himself. When I used a fingerprint expert, it was usually to educate the jury on why there weren’t prints on the gun.
2. You don’t find intimate injuries in most sexual assault cases.
This is pet peeve of mine. Every assault victim on SVU has major injuries. So juries come to expect this of every rape case. But in real life, you’re mores likely to see no injuries at all. This is anatomy that can stretch to fit a baby, and even in violent assaults, where other injuries result, there are no intimate injuries. The prosecution usually has a call an expert witness to explain this and get over the jurors’ expectations.
3. Most rapists don’t lurk in bushes.
Rapes committed by strangers do happen, and get a lot of media coverage when they do — but usually a rapist is a man the victim knows intimately: an ex-boyfriend or stepfather; her doctor or minister; a teacher or coach; a professional colleague or the guy she invited home from a bar. I no longer worry about someone breaking in through my window, but I’m more cautious about who I’ll invite in.
4. Prosecutors don’t wear stilettoes.
Female prosecutors on TV sashay to court in four-inch Manolos. But real prosecutors are on their feet all day and often lugging big boxes of exhibits, so comfy shoes are key. The seasoned female prosecutor wears mid-range heels: you look nice for the jury but won’t break a toe when you stand to object. Sometimes the walk to the courthouse is done in flip-flops, with a quick switcheroo right before the judge takes the bench.
5. The victim isn’t a beautiful young heiress who secretly works as a stripper.
But you already knew that.
6. Police stations don’t have huge plasma screen TVs -
…on which they can instantly call up images and facts about suspects, and flashing red dots of a cell phones moving around the map.
7. The bad guy will never confess with his lawyer sitting right there.
You know the scene. In a dingy jailhouse meeting room, the prosecutor badgers the defendant until he sobbingly confesses: “Okay, I killed her! I had no choice!” Meanwhile, the defense attorney sits there looking mildly constipated. A real defense attorney is as likely to let his client be questioned by the prosecutors as a lobster is to throw himself into a pot of boiling water. Defense attorneys know the vast majority of their clients are guilty – and any time a defendant opens his mouth, he risks revealing that. As a writer, I understand why this scene is so popular – the prosecutor hero needs to find out what really happened, and only the killer can say for sure. But it’s pure fiction. (That said, I will always have a crush on Sam Waterston, the maestro of this scene on Law & Order.)
What do you think? Do you love TV crime dramas, or hate them, or both? What do you think are the best moments? The worst? And should I start wearing high heels now that I don’t have to lug exhibits to court? Leave your comments!